Added help wanted label

shouldn't we open a new issue inside pkgs-base for each of those packages?

probably... altough I think we need to reconsider the group names. Ideally matching group names to Section (as in debian/control) might be a good move.

I have a good chunk of these packages un-systemd (and have for a while now -- and on this very git):

• gvfs-daemons
• libaccountsservice0
• libpulse0
• network-manager
• packagekit
• pulseaudio
• realmd

In the gnome group:

• cinnamon-screensaver
• cinnamon-session
• cinnamon-settings-daemon
• gnome-disk-utility
• gnome-screensaver
• gnome-session-bin
• gnome-shell
• gnome-system-monitor
• libmutter0e
• mate-screensaver
• mate-session-manager
• gdm3 (unD'd but doesn't run right)
• gnome-logs (a systemd log viewer, so it cannot really be unD'd, but it can be removed from gnome, which I did)

Jaret: i will review them during next week, eventually ask you something about and/or suggest eventual changes to match the devuan repository structure, and then push them on our CI for building.

Thanks for that

I have a few of these without systemd in my project files:

• transmission
• monopd
• knot (and knot-libs that comes with it)
• clamav
• mpd

I'm happy to maintain transmission and monopd, and keep the others in sync with the debian versions for jessie as needed.

replying to myself: trying to map package sections as groups in gitlab is a bad idea... use one group ie: devuan-packages and use project tags to identify the sections instead.

see devuan-project#42 (closed)